Is the email program dead? Did the whole world just migrate away from Hotmail over to Facebook when we weren’t looking? Does anyone else care?
Weirdly, the answer seems to be yes, yes, and no. Email has never gone away, and its advantages are unique: but the email client seems to be going the way of the Gopher.
Which is a bit odd when you consider how useful it still is. Nobody knows your email address unless you tell them, and messages are private by default. These are still the internet’s universal protocols for private communication, something Web 2.0 types only grudgingly admit exists.
The F/OSS alternative, Mozilla’s Thunderbird, was for ages a spartan and neglected poor relative of the browser. Versions 1.x and 2.x each seemed to be stalled for years. Thunderbird was also handicapped by inheriting a toxic legacy: its predecessor was on the receiving end of one of the most damning critiques of programming ever written.
Jamie Zawinski had written the original Netscape email client and returned to the scene after the program had been open sourced. He’s written several entertaining essays (sample: “my C version of this code was able to thread 10,000 messages in less than half a second on a low-end 90 MHz Pentium”) but Groupware bad is a good introduction.
The Thunderbird team seemed to want “the community” to sprout lots of add-ons, as they had with Firefox, then noticed that they hadn’t, and so finally decided to integrate the most-needed ones into the program itself. It was a good move, as Thunderbird is now actually quite good. It’s striving to add sophisticated features (virtual folders, fast search, tabs) but doesn’t seem to have got too bloated in doing so. The configuration UI remains clean and consistent.
We have to be honest – managing your own POP3 or IMAP accounts always was a bit of a minority pastime. Notes and Outlook ruled the roost on corporate PCs. Most of the rest of the world – normal people – only ever used a webmail service as a primary email account.
Facebook offers them a pretty straightforward upgrade – with the illusion of privacy, no spam, and a pretty easy to use address book. Just don’t tell Facebook investors that one day it might be as profitable as Hotmail… But for me and many of you I suspect, the choice of email client is something in which you make a bit of investment, and a careful decision.
And what a sorry landscape we have before us.
Mac users get a good email client bundled with the OS. It’s not the fastest, or the lightest, but it has improved steadily over the years, taking advantage of system improvements such as better threading and search. It’s now really, really good.
IMAP handling is excellent, which for me means both the client and server accurately reflect the state of your mailboxes, and do so efficiently, without excessive CPU or network load. Using Apple’s MobileMe you can take your filters with you to a new installation. It’s all so nice, I take it for granted. But that’s the only bright spot in a landscape marked by major players leaving the scene.
On Windows, it’s a bit pitiful. The choices of a good IMAP/POP client are diminishing. After rebranding Outlook Express as Vista Mail, Microsoft dropped the email client entirely from Windows 7. It’s now available as a free download, and renamed again, to Windows Live Mail. After 18 years of great service, Eudora [history] gave up the ghost in 2006, with its replacement a fork of the Thunderbird codebase, which we were promised would be Eudora-ised.
Back in the day, Eudora was a superb email program, with one of the most honest and amusing changelogs in the business. Shortly after that, the sole author behind the venerable Pegasus Mail decided to jack it in. (Only to change his mind – see below.)
Today, there’s the The Bat! – complete with inexplicable! exclamation! mark – which hails from Chisinau, in deepest Moldova. Where, presumably, bats deliver email (rather than winged horses).
The Bat! is very powerful indeed, a real power user’s program, allowing you to fine tune IMAP communications. It comes with powerful views and filters and a few unique hallmark features, such as built-in message encryption and configuration portability. There’s even a version that runs off a USB stick.
The drawback is that it can take all day to set up, it costs real money, and is as friendly as a Swiss Army Knife – enough to deter (perhaps unfairly) the more casual user. For anyone who ever telnet-ed to port
110 and typed list, the Bat! is for you.
And then there’s the prodigal email client, Pegasus. For many readers I’ll bet this Netware client that predates dial-up accounts was your choice throughout the 1990s: Pegasus Mail. And it’s still here, one man’s burden. Two years ago the programmer responsible, David Harris, chucked it all in, only to change his mind. Verity Stob wrote a splendid account of Pegasus Mail that’s better than any review. Well, Pegasus still survives. If you’ve used it this long, why move away?
And er, that’s almost it. So Mac users are deliriously happy with Apple Mail, Linux users seem happy enough with Thunderbird (or a self-built version of pine or elm, perhaps) and Windows users struggle on with a bizarre choice of specialist apps, or Outlook Express/Vista Mail/Windows Live Mail.
Opera Mail – surprisingly unsung
That leaves one of the best kept secrets on all three platforms Windows, Mac and Linux uncovered. Meeting Opera founder and chairman Jon von Tetzchner last week I nagged him, as I almost always do, about the secret Opera mail project. Opera has been hiding an amazing email program for seven years now, in a place nobody would think of looking: in a web browser. Was now the time to spring this on an unsuspecting world?
I’m still not sure. In fact, I’m entirely certain Opera isn’t going to start promoting Mail all of a sudden. But you can’t accuse von Tetzchner of not eating his own dog food: he said he personally has between 20GB and 30GB of email in his own Opera Mail email archive, going back over 15 years. He agrees the landscape is pretty dire now: “Email clients have gone away.”
It’s not as if Opera has been completely neglecting Opera Mail. In version 9.5, it got a significant overhaul which saw the back end revamped, resulting in much improved performance: there are no stutters even with multiple accounts, or multi-gigabyte mail archives.
(As an aside, Vista and Vista 2010 Windows 7 seem to have this annoying habit of turning a stuttering, but still functioning program into a system-wide seizure – the screen dramatically fades into white then back again, the conventional effect Hollywood uses when the main character is hit over head by a wrench, and passes out. After a while a dialog box pops up asking you if you want to terminate the stuttering process – which was actually doing fine until Windows decided to “help”. I found that all these email programs – Live Mail – the Bat, occasionally even Thunderbird – suffered from nanny Microsoft sizing them up for a premature kill. But I digress.)
What confounds newcomers to Opera Mail is its database-like approach. At first, you never quite know what’s going on. Initial versions (back when Opera called it M2) eschewed folders completely. The program replaced the mailbox hierarchy view with “live views” and a Bayesian engine you were expected to train, giving you more views onto the mail.
The real-time search worked (and still works) incredibly well. But I’m not alone in feeling disconcerted by the lack of mail folders, and was relieved when Opera made a concession recently to view by IMAP folder. Couldn’t Opera break newcomers in gently?
Jon von Tetzchner’s answer was a polite version of “well, boo hoo”. He said he couldn’t imagine anything more tedious than filing away 300 emails every day into boxes. But that’s not the point, I thought, if you’ve already invested in mailboxes and IMAP folders.
Here’s an example. A mail rule will divert your mailing lists (for example) into a mailbox. You then pick out the ones you keep into another mailbox, and trash the rest. The way to do this in Opera Mail is that it will automatically create a view for a mailing list, and a filter will cut down the one with stars or a particular tag. It’s much easier if you start the Opera way, but the Opera way is not much help if you’ve already got mailboxes.
Opera Mail is probably just one or two UI features short of capturing refugees from Outlook, Eudora and the rest. Chairman Jon mentioned that somebody had even skinned Opera to make the Mail program look like a fully independent email application, a tribute to how radically you can customise Opera (I haven’t been able to find the skin in question to corroborate this). [Update: it’s called Hugin and you can find it here. Thanks to Jeroen for the link] Labels could be easier to customise (it’s quite a manual effort now).
These are unlikely to come from the ‘community’, because Opera doesn’t work that way. But for now, alas, this amazing software remains quite forbidding. I modestly suggest that if users were able to pay a small fee for an “Opera Mail Edition”, in the knowledge that development was active, and features people needed were being added, then wonderful things could happen.
But paying for software development? Whatever next?