Posts Tagged ‘nepotism’

Technorati knocks itself out. Again

Sunday, May 25th, 2008

Technorati, the comically inept search engine, has redesigned itself again – knocking itself out in the process.

The site was down when bloggers checked in yesterday.

More importantly, the latest redesign is a tacit admission that it’s given up on its original mission – indexing the world’s weblogs. Technorati now claims to present “zillions of photos, videos, blogs and more”, and rather apologetically adds the rejoinder: “Some of them have to be good.

No. Why?

In practice, Technorati now returns only a tiny number of blogs – and prefers to offer thumbnails of digital images already tagged with a keyword. A technical challenge that does not exactly require the algorithmic prowess of a Donald Knuth.

Technorati, the comically inept search engine, has redesigned itself again – knocking itself out in the process.

The site was down when bloggers checked in yesterday.

More importantly, the latest redesign is a tacit admission that it’s given up on its original mission – indexing the world’s weblogs. Technorati now claims to present “zillions of photos, videos, blogs and more”, and rather apologetically adds the rejoinder: “Some of them have to be good.”

No. Why?

In practice, Technorati now returns only a tiny number of blogs – and prefers to offer thumbnails of digital images already tagged with a keyword. A technical challenge that does not exactly require the algorithmic prowess of a Donald Knuth.

So what was always a lousy blog search tool is now little more than a lousy image search tool – this is not going to worry Yahoo! or Google.

Call it a strategic retreat. The site has fought heroically to stem the Rise of the Machines, exemplified by tools like this, but lost. Who would have guessed?

Well, not the journalist pals of founder Dave Sifry, and A-list bloggers who gave Technorati oodles of back-scratching press when it launched in 2003. Hacks were as keen as Sifry to evangelise blogging, and instantly conferred guru status on him; here was a man with the numbers that mattered! Reports were invariably too kind to mention that Technorati rarely worked well, and often didn’t work at all.

The moral of the story is hard to miss. Maybe ideological evangelism and engineering don’t really mix. Evangelism and honest reporting certainly don’t.

Govt IT 2.0: self-nominated for glory

Tuesday, May 15th, 2007

Although the New Statesman magazine’s annual New Media Awards (NMA) don’t quite match up to the EFF’s annual Nepotism Award – nothing quite does – they’re still a rich source of humour and embarrassment.

Getting an NMA is the equivalent of getting an orange at half time from the coach of your village football team, just for turning up in the rain. But this year, even by its own standards, New Statesman appears to have outsourced the nominations to a team of satirical writers.

What else can explain one nominee, East Devon District Council, which is lauded for “using AJAX web technology” to “provide efficiencies in waste collections”.

Rubbish enabling rubbish, if you like.

But Garbage 2.0 faces a tough challenge from another nominee, Jimmy Leach, “head of digital communications” at 10 Downing Street.

“Since he started in his post at Downing Street,” we learn, “Jimmy Leach has transformed the government’s approach to new media”.

That’s remarkably similar to the boilerplate text Number 10 sends out to accompany Jimmy Leach’s forays into the real world:

“Since he started in his post at Downing Street, Jimmy Leach has transformed the government’s approach to new media,” apparently.

How? Well, “he executed the e-petitions strategy which has resulted in many millions of people engaging with the website. He has also instituted a series of podcasts featuring the PM and personalities such as Eddie Izzard, Stephen Fry, Chris Evans, Bill Bryson and more”.

Your taxes at work, there.

In true New Labour fashion, members of the public are queueing up to offer spontaneous gestures of appreciation.

One appreciative commenter gushes:

“It may seem a small thing but as a citizen to have a direct voice into Downing Street has got to be a huge step forward and more listening to the people, not just hearing them, must become an increasingly valuable asset to any premier, now and in the future.”

“Thank you Jimmy, long may this development continue.”

Yes, it’s about listening not just hearing. Where would be without the web? Hearing but not listening, probably.

But even that display of party hackery is outdone by Joanne Chew, of the website Local Directgov. Joanne has modestly nominated herself.

“Key to the implementation and deployment of LDG was effective stakeholder communication and management. Multiple channels of communication were employed including e-mail alerts, feedback forms from events, articles in magazines, journals, newsletters, ambient media [ what's that? - ed.], workshops, conference, ‘How to guides’ posted in website, face-to-face engagement.”

Alas, not everyone is appreciative, as you can see from the comments:

“It would be worth investigating not just how much money has been directly spent on this shambles – and for what miniscule benefit – but also how much more has been spent in wasted time across 388 local authorities,” writes one commenter. Indeed – much of the work of the LocalGov was famously replicated in a few minutes using Google: check out Directionless Gov.

“Perhaps a reputable magazine with an interest in civic society might care to carry out some enquiries?” asks another.

Alas, that reputable magazine probably won’t be the New Statesman, which takes time out from puffing blogs and wikis for some occasional hard-headed policy analysis:

“The world is catching on to smart cards as a way of easing the growing tension between security issues and civil liberties,” wrote one Nagemeh Nasiritousi in the supplement to honour the magazine’s 2003 New Media Awards. The supplement was sponsored by Schlumberger…the same Schlumberger that’s lobbying furiously for the government’s highly popular ID card scheme.

EFF founder must be cheered for founding EFF – EFF Founder

Wednesday, April 20th, 2005

He made it. Now it made him

If you think that backslapping awards and honorific titles are a feudal relic – an archaic and degenerate indulgence of the old world’s imperial plutocracies, think again. They’re alive and well in the New World – and flourishing in the even Newer World of Cyberspace!

Which, we can’t help noticing, has its own self-congratulatory plutocracy, whose members are just as eager to slap each other on the back, and give each other fancy titles, as the Lords and Dukes of yore.

Many awards: Thai dictator Thanom KittikachornIt’s perfectly proper that EFF founders should get awards from the organization they created. So writes one John Perry Barlow – co-founder and Vice Chairman of the EFF, and BFFL-GDGBNCIA,WCR (rtd), to give him his full title. (We may have missed a few out – sorry, John). Barlow objects to our story EFF honors EFF founder with EFF award:

Cheap shot, Dude.From: John Perry Barlow

Mitch deserves it. You know that. There’s nothing unseemly about it. We have an independent selection process. The EFF gives the award, but we don’t pick the winners or even the nominees.

We do restrict the jury from including people who are still actively associated with EFF on a daily basis. John and I are still on the board, and likely to remain so for some time. So we’re not candidates.

I doubt you’ll clarify this, but journalism deserves better from you. And usually gets it.

That Kapor is a nice man who does good charitable deeds isn’t the point of contest. The point we were making is that in Western societies, the only organizations who give the founders honors tend to be dodgy. Look at the spontaneous gestures of generosity that the old Communist parties would bestow on the wrinkly dictators. Or self-satisfied corporations, sending the founder off into the sunset with yet another founder’s award.

While we’re always on the lookout for new norms of behaviour in “cyberspace”, some old norms of human behaviour die hard. And one of them is the sheer revulsion felt at backslapping. Just as we have a deep biological aversion to meat that smells foul, or looks like it’s turned foul, so we react to cult-like gestures, such as self-congratulation. It’s a sign that something isn’t quite healthy.

There’s also a good case to be made for promoting a campaigner or activist who hasn’t been fully recognized, and whose work could benefit from the attendant publicity.

Nevertheless, to drive his point home, John urges us to publish his congratulations to Kapor, which we’re happy to do, too.

Many awards: Soviet President Leonid Brezhnev

Brother Mitchell,

Fifteen years ago, when we were conceiving the EFF Pioneer Awards, I remember thinking that you were already an entirely fitting recipient. But I also knew propriety would require that you wait, and maybe for a long time. In those uncertain times, I could only dream that we had begun a tradition that would survive long to eventually give you what you richly deserved from the beginning.

At the time, I even imagined presenting this to you myself. Unfortunately, we were so scrupulous about designing an independent selection process that I only learned of this about ten days ago. By that time, I had already been contracted to a commitment in London that I could neither reschedule nor wriggle from beneath.

Perhaps it’s appropriate, given the nature of what you created and have defended all these years, that I’m doing this virtually. The heartfelt hug that would come with it will have to wait until the next time we share prana.

I hope everyone present tonight is pointedly aware that, without you, there would be no Electronic Frontier Foundation. It wouldn’t have begun in the first place and it wouldn’t have survived a number of nearly terminal crises over the years. Without your vision, insight, wisdom, humor, hard work, and material support, it simply wouldn’t have happened. I helped, John Gilmore helped even more, and we can be grateful to a multitude of other brave and freedom-loving souls who did most of the heavy lifting. But you were the bottom line.

And had the Electronic Frontier Foundation not been there during this critical time, when the very foundations of the future were being laid, the world might already be a place where local governments had successfully established the right and ability to impose themselves human culture all over the planet. What little hadn’t been locked down by governments might now be owned by the media golems. The Internet might have been supplanted by the Information Superhighway, and the Web, if it existed at all, would look like a way to freebase television.

Fraternal greetingsWithout you, and your off-hand remark that architecture is politics, Larry Lessig might still be an obscure professor at Harvard Law School.

[ So he's to blame - ed.]

There would be no Creative Commons nor Canto Livre nor Brazilian revolution against WIPO. Without you and your creation of the CIX, the Internet might still be a marginal network connecting a few academics and government officials. Without you, there might be no general understanding in courts all over the world that the rights that had adhered to previous media adhere as clearly to Cyberspace.I know that you had your agonies on behalf of creating the future we are now lucky enough to inhabit. There were times when EFF board meetings were as tumultuous as Sicilian weddings and I knew how much these donnybrooks pained you.

Indeed, I know how much I have pained you in various ways. I know that there were times when you felt that Gilmore and I had hijacked your beloved EFF and turned into radical libertarian fringe group. But you forgave, you stuck with us, and you hung with the cause.

As you know, I believe that one’s central task in life is to be a good ancestor. Generations many times unborn have a great ancestor in you. And if, in a couple of hundred years, people everywhere are able to say what they believe, know what they hunger to know, and use tools for thought that empower the truth, it will be in significant part because Mitch Kapor descended one May afternoon from a pale Wyoming sky and set about to free the future.

I am grateful to you. I admire you. And I love you.

Thank you, Mitch. You’re a real pioneer.

John Perry Barlow, Cognitive Dissident

Co-Founder & Vice Chairman, Electronic Frontier Foundation Berkman Fellow, Harvard Law SchoolHome(stead) Page: http://www.eff.org/~barlow

Blog: http://blog.barlowfriendz.net

In cyberspace, no one knows you're a highly-decorated dog

And thank you, John.

Bootnotes:

FL-GDFormer lyricist, The Grateful Dead

WCRWyoming Cattle Rancher

BFFellow of the Berkman Center for Internet and Society at Harvard Law School. But then these days, who isn’t?